From the European linen to the American cedar. The vegetal materials in the South American colonial paintings supports
Keywords:
Colonial painting, canvas, strainers
Abstract
From a historical point of view and based on the materiality of two pictorial pieces this research aims to reflect about colonial´s painting materials, resources, applications and techniques. After working on a four thousands corpus of colonial paintings, the proposal involves the canvas and strainers study of two South American paintings, San Luis Gonzaga and San Juan Nepomuceno, belonging to the Church of San Ignacio in Buenos Aires city, in Argentina.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
BARTON, H. (2007), “Starch residues on museum artefacts: implications for determining tool use”, Journal of Archaeological Science 34. Elsevier, 1752- 1762.
BERGER, G. (2000), Conservation of Paintings. Research and Innovations. London. Archetype Publications. 2000.
BONET BLANCO, M. C. (2001). “El retablo barroco escenografía e imagen”. En Actas de simposio El Monasterio del Escorial y la pintura. Madrid, 623- 642.
BRUQUETAS GALÁN, R. (2002) Técnicas y materiales de la pintura española en los siglos de oro. Madrid: Fundación de Apoyo a la Historia del Arte Hispánico.
BUCHINGER, M., FALCONE, R. (1957). “Las Meliáceas argentinas”. Revista de Investigaciones Forestales. Buenos Aires.
BURUCÚA, J. E. et. al. (2000). Tarea de diez años, Buenos Aires: Fundación Antorchas.
BUSTILLO, A. (1994), “Algunos aspectos del montaje de telas coloniales de la región sudamericana”. En Abracor VII Seminario, noviembre 1994. Petrópolis.
BUSTILLO, A. (1998). “Estado de conservación, materiales, características del soporte, técnica pictórica y tratamiento”. En Una serie de pinturas cuzqueñas de Santa Catalina: historia, restauración, química, Buenos Aires: Fundación Antorchas.
CIATTI, M. et. al. (2008).The restoration of one of the canvasses from the Palazzo Chigi in san Quirico d’Orcia: Notes on an “Impossible” Restoration . OPD Restauro. Suplement with english text. Firenze: OPD.
CINTRON, B. “Research and Development Search”, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service en www. Fs.fed.us/global/iitf/Cedrelaodorata.pdf US FOREST SERVICE. [consulta 04/06/2016].
DEL ZOTTO, F. (1990). “Preservation of canvas paintings: structural solutions in relation to environmental changes”, ICOM, Preprints of the 9th Triennial Meeting, Dresden.
GORDON COOK, J. (1993). Handbook of Textile Fibres. I Natural Fibres, Durham: Merrow.
GREAVES, P.H; SAVILLE, B.P. (1995). Microscopy of textile fibres, Londres: Bios Scientific Publishers Limited.
JÁUREGUI, A., PENHOS, M. (1999). “Las imágenes en la Argentina colonial. Entre la devoción y el arte”. En Nueva historia argentina. Arte, sociedad y política, ed. Burucúa. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
KIRBY, J., (2005). “Fuentes para la comprensión: Por qué una obra de arte es como es”. Acta del II Congreso de GEICC Investigación en conservación y restauración, Barcelona.
LITTLE, E.L., Jr., WADSWORTH, F.H. (1964). Common trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Agriculture Handbook No. 249, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
MECKLENBURG, M. (1982). “Some aspects of the mechanical behavior of fabric-supported paintings”. Report to the Smithsonian Institution. 12–15.
MECKLENBURG, M., TUMOSA, C. S. (1991) b. “Mechanical behavior of paintings subjected to changes in temperature and relative humidity”. In Art in transit, ed. M. F. Mecklenburg. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art.172–214.
MEHRA, V. R. (2001). Foderatura a freddo: i testi fondamentali per la metodologia e la pratica, Firenze: Nardini.
MORALES, A. et al. (2016). “Alternative methodology for traditional interventions: A colonial painting and its lining with the nap bond method”, Journal of Cultural Heritage 18, Elsevier. 362–365.
O’DONNELL, P. (2006), El conflicto entre Perón y la Iglesia, Diario La Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
PALOMINO, A. (1944); [1ª ed. 1715-1724]. Museo pictórico y escala óptica, Buenos Aires: Poseidón.
PERCIVAL-PRESCOTT, W. (2003). “Introduction”. En Lining Paintings. Papers from the Greenwich Conference on comparative lining Techniques. London: Archetype.
RIBERA, A.; SCHENONE, H. (1944). “Los lienzos corredizos y breve noticia del pintor Miguel Aucell”, Archivum, Tomo II Cuaderno 2, Buenos Aires.
ROCHE, A. (2003). “Approche du príncipe de reversibilité des doublages des peintures sur toile”. Studies un conservation (IIC), London: James & James,Ltd . Volume 48 Number 2.
ROSTAIN, E. (1981). Rentoilage et transposition des tableaux. Puteaux: Erec.
SCHENONE, H. (1992). Iconografía del arte colonial. Los Santos. Buenos Aires: Fundación Tarea.
SCICOLONE, G.(2002). Restauración de la pintura contemporánea.De las técnicas de intervención tradicionales a las nuevas tecnologías. Sevilla: Nerea.
SPERONI, P. (2005). “Minimo intervento Conservativo nel Restauro dei Dipinti”. En Cesmar7. Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale “COLORE E CONSERVAZIONE – Materiali e Metodi nel Restauro delle Opere Policrome Mobili”, Padova: Casa Editrice Il Prato.
VICENS VIVES, J., (ed.), (1972). Historia de España y América social y económica, vol. IV, Barcelona: Vicens Vives.
VILLARQUIDE JEVENOIS, A. (2005). La pintura sobre tela II. Sevilla: Nerea.
VILLERS, C., (ed.), (2000). The Fabric of Images. European Paintings on Textile Supports in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries, London: Archetype.
VILLERS, C., (ed.). (2003). Lining Paintings. Papers from the Greenwich Conference on comparative lining Techniques. London: Archetype.
WEDDIGEN, E. (2005). Introduzione alle relazioni sul minimo intervento a Thien. Cosa significa Minimal Intervention?”. En Minimo intervento Conservativo nel Restauro dei Dipinti. Cesmar7. Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale COLORE E CONSERVAZIONE – Materiali e Metodi nel Restauro delle Opere Policrome Mobili, 29-30 Ottobre 2004, Teatro Comunale, Thiene (VI), Padova: Casa Editrice Il Prato.
YOUNG, C. (2012). “History of fabric supports”, en Stoner J. H., Rushfield R., ed., Conservation of easel paintings. London: Routledge.
BERGER, G. (2000), Conservation of Paintings. Research and Innovations. London. Archetype Publications. 2000.
BONET BLANCO, M. C. (2001). “El retablo barroco escenografía e imagen”. En Actas de simposio El Monasterio del Escorial y la pintura. Madrid, 623- 642.
BRUQUETAS GALÁN, R. (2002) Técnicas y materiales de la pintura española en los siglos de oro. Madrid: Fundación de Apoyo a la Historia del Arte Hispánico.
BUCHINGER, M., FALCONE, R. (1957). “Las Meliáceas argentinas”. Revista de Investigaciones Forestales. Buenos Aires.
BURUCÚA, J. E. et. al. (2000). Tarea de diez años, Buenos Aires: Fundación Antorchas.
BUSTILLO, A. (1994), “Algunos aspectos del montaje de telas coloniales de la región sudamericana”. En Abracor VII Seminario, noviembre 1994. Petrópolis.
BUSTILLO, A. (1998). “Estado de conservación, materiales, características del soporte, técnica pictórica y tratamiento”. En Una serie de pinturas cuzqueñas de Santa Catalina: historia, restauración, química, Buenos Aires: Fundación Antorchas.
CIATTI, M. et. al. (2008).The restoration of one of the canvasses from the Palazzo Chigi in san Quirico d’Orcia: Notes on an “Impossible” Restoration . OPD Restauro. Suplement with english text. Firenze: OPD.
CINTRON, B. “Research and Development Search”, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service en www. Fs.fed.us/global/iitf/Cedrelaodorata.pdf US FOREST SERVICE. [consulta 04/06/2016].
DEL ZOTTO, F. (1990). “Preservation of canvas paintings: structural solutions in relation to environmental changes”, ICOM, Preprints of the 9th Triennial Meeting, Dresden.
GORDON COOK, J. (1993). Handbook of Textile Fibres. I Natural Fibres, Durham: Merrow.
GREAVES, P.H; SAVILLE, B.P. (1995). Microscopy of textile fibres, Londres: Bios Scientific Publishers Limited.
JÁUREGUI, A., PENHOS, M. (1999). “Las imágenes en la Argentina colonial. Entre la devoción y el arte”. En Nueva historia argentina. Arte, sociedad y política, ed. Burucúa. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
KIRBY, J., (2005). “Fuentes para la comprensión: Por qué una obra de arte es como es”. Acta del II Congreso de GEICC Investigación en conservación y restauración, Barcelona.
LITTLE, E.L., Jr., WADSWORTH, F.H. (1964). Common trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Agriculture Handbook No. 249, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
MECKLENBURG, M. (1982). “Some aspects of the mechanical behavior of fabric-supported paintings”. Report to the Smithsonian Institution. 12–15.
MECKLENBURG, M., TUMOSA, C. S. (1991) b. “Mechanical behavior of paintings subjected to changes in temperature and relative humidity”. In Art in transit, ed. M. F. Mecklenburg. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art.172–214.
MEHRA, V. R. (2001). Foderatura a freddo: i testi fondamentali per la metodologia e la pratica, Firenze: Nardini.
MORALES, A. et al. (2016). “Alternative methodology for traditional interventions: A colonial painting and its lining with the nap bond method”, Journal of Cultural Heritage 18, Elsevier. 362–365.
O’DONNELL, P. (2006), El conflicto entre Perón y la Iglesia, Diario La Nación, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
PALOMINO, A. (1944); [1ª ed. 1715-1724]. Museo pictórico y escala óptica, Buenos Aires: Poseidón.
PERCIVAL-PRESCOTT, W. (2003). “Introduction”. En Lining Paintings. Papers from the Greenwich Conference on comparative lining Techniques. London: Archetype.
RIBERA, A.; SCHENONE, H. (1944). “Los lienzos corredizos y breve noticia del pintor Miguel Aucell”, Archivum, Tomo II Cuaderno 2, Buenos Aires.
ROCHE, A. (2003). “Approche du príncipe de reversibilité des doublages des peintures sur toile”. Studies un conservation (IIC), London: James & James,Ltd . Volume 48 Number 2.
ROSTAIN, E. (1981). Rentoilage et transposition des tableaux. Puteaux: Erec.
SCHENONE, H. (1992). Iconografía del arte colonial. Los Santos. Buenos Aires: Fundación Tarea.
SCICOLONE, G.(2002). Restauración de la pintura contemporánea.De las técnicas de intervención tradicionales a las nuevas tecnologías. Sevilla: Nerea.
SPERONI, P. (2005). “Minimo intervento Conservativo nel Restauro dei Dipinti”. En Cesmar7. Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale “COLORE E CONSERVAZIONE – Materiali e Metodi nel Restauro delle Opere Policrome Mobili”, Padova: Casa Editrice Il Prato.
VICENS VIVES, J., (ed.), (1972). Historia de España y América social y económica, vol. IV, Barcelona: Vicens Vives.
VILLARQUIDE JEVENOIS, A. (2005). La pintura sobre tela II. Sevilla: Nerea.
VILLERS, C., (ed.), (2000). The Fabric of Images. European Paintings on Textile Supports in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries, London: Archetype.
VILLERS, C., (ed.). (2003). Lining Paintings. Papers from the Greenwich Conference on comparative lining Techniques. London: Archetype.
WEDDIGEN, E. (2005). Introduzione alle relazioni sul minimo intervento a Thien. Cosa significa Minimal Intervention?”. En Minimo intervento Conservativo nel Restauro dei Dipinti. Cesmar7. Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale COLORE E CONSERVAZIONE – Materiali e Metodi nel Restauro delle Opere Policrome Mobili, 29-30 Ottobre 2004, Teatro Comunale, Thiene (VI), Padova: Casa Editrice Il Prato.
YOUNG, C. (2012). “History of fabric supports”, en Stoner J. H., Rushfield R., ed., Conservation of easel paintings. London: Routledge.
Published
2017-12-16
How to Cite
Gallegos, D., Morales, A., González Pondal, D., Siracusano, G., & Marte, F. (2017). From the European linen to the American cedar. The vegetal materials in the South American colonial paintings supports. Ge-Conservacion, 12, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.37558/gec.v12i0.446
Section
Artículos
- Copyright and intellectual property belongs to author. Author guarantees editing and publishing rights to Ge-Conservación Journal, under a Creative Commons Attribution License. This license allows others to share the work with authorship and the original source of publication acknowledgement.
- Articles can be used for scientific and educational purposes but never for commercial use, being sanctioned by law.
- The whole content of the article is author’s responsibility.
- Ge-Conservación Journal and authors may establish additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the work version published at the Journal (for example, on institutional repositories or on a book) with acknowledgment of the original publication on this Journal.
- Author is allowed and encouraged to disseminate his works electronically (for example, on institutional repositories or on its own website) after being published on Ge-Conservación Journal. This will contribute for fruitful interchanges as also for wider and earlier citations of the author’s works.
- Author’s personal data will only be used for the Journal purposes and will not be given to others.