Using and analyzing the ‘behavior index’ tool to manage a conceptual artwork by Joseph Kosuth
Abstract
This article intends to apply a conceptual tool denominated ‘behavior index’ (Stigter 2011) to manage the artwork One and three plants, 1965 by Joseph Kosuth. Analyzing a variable artwork’s ‘behavior’ through time and its different iterations, allows us to have a biographical perspective on it and enables a more accountable decision-making process for its preservation. Given the broad spectra of documentation created and archived whenever artworks with variable characteristics are installed, a systematic, simple and easily interpreted approach is needed. This tool enables institutions to encompass great amounts of information, often subjective, into a visible summary of the artwork’s biography. Applying this tool to One and three plants has allowed the definition of limits in its variability, reflecting upon its previous exhibitions and eventual future presentations, giving place to a critical analysis, essential for its preservation.
Downloads
References
COLEÇÃO BERARDO, One and three plants, Joseph Kosuth, https://www.berardocollection.com/?sid=50004&CID=102&work=321&lang=pt, [28.01.2021].
DEPOCAS, A., J. IPPOLITO, and C. JONES, eds. (2003). Permanence through change: The Variable Media Approach / L’Approche des Médias Variables: La permanence par le changement. New York and Montreal: Guggenheim Museum and Daniel Langlois Foundation for Art, Science, and Technology
FABRE, E. e SCHLATTER, C. (2009). Algumas obras a ler, Lisboa, Museu Coleção Berardo.
FOSTER, H. (2004). Art since 1900: modernism, antimodernism, postmodernism. London, Thames & Hudson, (pp. 603-604, 607, 663).
GALERIE RENÉE ZIEGLER (1992). Joseph Kosuth, Protoinvestigations 1965 & The first investigations 1967, Zurique
GEGNER. A. Correspondência eletrónica, Galeria Sprüth Magers [2.06.2020].
GORDON, R. (2014). “Identifying and pursuing authenticity in contemporary art.”, Gordon, R., Hermens, E. and Lennard, F. (eds.) Authenticity and Replication: The ‘Real Thing’ in Art and Conservation. Archetype Publications: London, UK.
KOSUTH, J. (1991). Art after Philosophy and After: Collected Writings, 1966-1990, Gabriele Guercio (Ed.), Cambridge: MIT Press, https://monoskop.org/images/4/46/Kosuth_Joseph_1969_1991_Art_After_Philosophy.pdf.
LABORATIVO (2014). Especial Viagem: O Museu Berardo é pura surpresa!. http://laborativo.blogspot.com/ [consulta: 22/09/2020].
LAPA, P. Correspondência eletrónica, Museu Coleção Berardo [consulta: 18/02/2014].
LAPA, P. Conserva telefónica, Museu Coleção Berardo [consulta: 15/05/2020].
MARÇAL, H. (2017). “Conservation in an era of participation”. Journal of the Institute of Conservation, 40(2): 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2017.1319872.
SMITH, C. Correspondência eletrónica, Joseph Kosuth Studio, Nova Iorque [consulta: 11/11/2020].
STIGTER, S. (2011). “How material is conceptual art? From certificate to materialization: installation practices of Joseph Kosuth’s ‘Glass (one and three)’.” Em T. Scholte, & G. Wharton (Eds.), Inside installations: theory and practice in the care of complex artworks: 69-80. Amsterdam University Press.
STIGTER, S. (2015). “Co-Producing Conceptual Art: A Conservator’s Testimony. RHA 04: Performing Documentation in the Conservation of Contemporary Art, (Eds.). Matos, L.A., Macedo, R., Heydenreich, G. Instituto de História da Arte, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa.
STIGTER, S. (2016). “Autoethnography as a new approach in conservation”, Studies in Conservation: IIC 2016 LA Congress: Saving the Now 61(S2): 227–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2016.1183104.
STIGTER, S. (2017). “A behaviour index for complex artworks: A conceptual tool for contemporary art conservation.” ICOM-CC 18th Triennial Conference Preprints, Copenhagen, 4–8 September 2017, ed. J. Bridgland, art. 0910. Paris, International Council of Museums. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=210b66af-e4f8-40bb-a3ad-fff65864bb57
VAN DE VALL, R., HÖLLING, H., SCHOLTE, T., & STIGTER, S. (2011). “Reflections on a biographical approach to contemporary art conservation”. J. Bridgland (Ed.), ICOM-CC: 16th Triennial Conference, Lisbon, 19-23 September 2011: preprints [cd-rom] Critério. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=d2340d58-6edb-49e9-baa8-c87ee11804e9.
WHARTON, G. (2015). “Artist intention and the conservation of contemporary art”. Hamilton, E., Dodson, K. (Ed.) Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Volume 22: 1-12. Washington, DC, The American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works. http://resources.culturalheritage.org/osg-postprints/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2015/05/osg022-01.pdf.
- Copyright and intellectual property belongs to author. Author guarantees editing and publishing rights to Ge-Conservación Journal, under a Creative Commons Attribution License. This license allows others to share the work with authorship and the original source of publication acknowledgement.
- Articles can be used for scientific and educational purposes but never for commercial use, being sanctioned by law.
- The whole content of the article is author’s responsibility.
- Ge-Conservación Journal and authors may establish additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the work version published at the Journal (for example, on institutional repositories or on a book) with acknowledgment of the original publication on this Journal.
- Author is allowed and encouraged to disseminate his works electronically (for example, on institutional repositories or on its own website) after being published on Ge-Conservación Journal. This will contribute for fruitful interchanges as also for wider and earlier citations of the author’s works.
- Author’s personal data will only be used for the Journal purposes and will not be given to others.