Poor images and NFTs. On the preservation of digital heritage through blockchain technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37558/gec.v26i1.1224
Keywords: contemporary art, new media art, digital heritage, art market, blockchain, digital art, art preservation

Abstract

The problems of digital art preservation have been recurrent in the last decades. These have led to justify the under representation of art associated with new technologies in contemporary art museums. The absence of clear protocols in the conservation of digital art and the significant economic and technical effort that it would entail have led to a situation of extreme precariousness of the digital image. The irruption of NFTs and blockchain technology seems to offer an opportunity to remedy the weaknesses associated with the characteristics of new media. The temporality, obsolescence, dynamism and instability of this type of works have called into question their possibility of enduring over time. The aim is to clarify whether the structure of data and metadata associated with transactions in the blockchain solve the challenge of protecting digital images from disappearance. Like this we could be in front of a potential new way of preservation of digital heritage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis David Rivero Moreno, Universidad de León

Doctor en Estudios Avanzados de Historia del Arte (Universidad de Granada). Licenciado en Historia del Arte (Universidad de Extremadura). Ha realizado estancias en la Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal), la Martin Luther Universität de Halle (Alemania) y la Comisión Europea, Bruselas (Bélgica), entre otras. Ha trabajado en el Museo Vostell de Malpartida de Cáceres y el Servicio de Archivos, Museos y Artes Plásticas de la Junta de Extremadura coordinando exposiciones y catálogos. A todo ello se debe añadir su actividad como docente e investigador en la Universidad de Granada, como profesor-tutor en la sede de la UNED en Sevilla y profesor colaborador en la UOC de Cataluña.
Como investigador ha participado en el proyecto europeo H2020 ROCK, centrado en la regeneración urbana en el contexto de las ciudades históricas europeas. Ha realizado un buen número de conferencias, ponencias y publicado artículos a nivel nacional e internacional. Su línea de investigación se centra principalmente en temas sobre la interacción del arte contemporáneo y las nuevas tecnologías, cultura digital, museos

References

ADORNO, T. W., HORKHEIMER, M. (2007). Dialéctica de la Ilustración, Madrid, Ediciones Akal.

BALDUF, L., FLORIAN, M., & SCHEUERMANN, B. (2022). “Dude, where’s my NFT: distributed infrastructures for digital art”. En Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Infrastructure for the Common Good,1-6.

BAUMAN, Z. (2007). Arte ¿líquido?, Madrid, Sequitur.

BENJAMIN, W. (1989). Discursos Interrumpidos I. Filosofía del Arte y de la Historia, Buenos Aires, Taurus.

CHOHAN, U. W. (2021). “Non-fungible tokens: Blockchains, scarcity, and value”, Critical Blockchain Research Initiative (CBRI) Working Papers.

COLELLA, S. (2022). “Disrupting the art market? Blockchain, NFTs and the promise of inclusion”. IL CAPITALE CULTURALE. Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage, 26: 233-256. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/2946

CURRID, E. (2007). “The economics of a good party: Social mechanics and the legitimization of art/culture”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 31: 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885728

DÉPOCAS, A. (2002). “Digital preservation: Recording the Recoding”. The Documentary Strategy. Ars Electronica. Takeover. Whos doing the Art of tomorrow.

DIETZ, S. (2013). “Collecting new-media art: Just like anything else, only different”. In Collecting the New, Princeton University Press, 85-102.

FAZLI, M., OWFI, A., y TAESIRI, M. R. (2021). “Under the skin of foundation nft auctions”. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7191199.

FHRONE, U. (1999). “Old art and new media: The contemporary museum”, Afterimage, 27(2): 9.

HAN, B.C. (2015). The transparency society, Stanford University Press.

IPPOLITO, J. (2022). Crypto-Preservation and the Ghost of Andy Warhol. In Arts, 11( 2): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts11020047

JANSSEN, S., y VERBOORD, M. (2015). “Cultural mediators and gatekeepers”, En International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 5: 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10424-6

JANSSON, A. (2002). “The mediatization of consumption: Towards an analytical framework of image culture”, Journal of consumer culture, 2(1): 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/146954050200200101

JOSELIT, D. (2021). “NFTs, or the readymade reversed.” October Magazine, 175: 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00419

MARTÍN PRADA, J. (2018). El ver y las imágenes en el tiempo de Internet, Madrid, Ediciones Akal.

MORRIS, S. (2001). Museums and new media art. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.

MURRAY, M. D. (2023). ¿Los NFT rescatan las regalías por reventa? La maravillosamente complicada capacidad de los contratos inteligentes de NFT para permitir derechos de regalías por reventa. Case Western Reserve J Law Technol Intern . 14(2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4164029.

PROCTOR, N. (2010). Digital: Museum as platform, curator as champion, in the age of social media. Curator: The Museum Journal, 53(1): 35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2009.00006.x

PYE, G. (2010). “Introduction: Trash as cultural category”. En Pye, G., y Schroth, S. Trash culture: Objects and obsolescence in cultural perspective. Peter Lang, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7238/artnodes.v0i33.416449

QUARANTA, D. (2014). “Saved by Copying. Web Collecting And the Preservation of Digital Artworks”. Possible Futures: Art, Museums and Digital Archives, 224-38.

RIVERO MORENO, L. D. (2017). “Inmaterialidades. Problemas de conservación del arte de los nuevos medios”. De Arte. Revista de Historia del Arte, 16: 227-238. https://doi.org/10.18002/da.v0i16.4974

RIVERO MORENO, L. D. (2018). Museums and digital era: preserving art through databases. Collection and Curation, 38(4): 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-02-2018-0002

SIEGELAUB, S. (1973). “The artist’s reserved rights transfer and sale agreement”. Leonardo, 6(4): 347-350.

SRNICEK, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.

STEYERL, H. (2009) “In defense of the poor image.” e-flux journal 10(11): 20

UNESCO (2003). Charter of the Preservation of Digital Heritage. París.

VAN HAAFTEN-SCHICK, L., y WHITAKER, A. (2020). “From the artist’s contract to the blockchain ledger: New forms of artists’ funding using NFTs, fractional equity, and resale royalties”. Fractional Equity, and Resale Royalties. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3842210

VIRILIO, P., (1998). Estética de la desaparición. Editorial Anagrama.

WANG, Y., HORKY, F., BAALS, L. J., LUCEY, B. M., y Vigne, S. A. (2022). “Bubbles all the way down? Detecting and date-stamping bubble behaviours in NFT and DeFi markets”, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 20(4): 415-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2022.2138161

WHITAKER, A. (2018). “Artist as owner not guarantor: The art market from the artist’s point of view”, Visual Resources, 34(1-2): 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2018.1435609

ZAFIRIS, A., y CHENG, X. (2022). “The business models of NFTs and fan tokens and how they build trust”. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics. 1(1, 2): 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-07-2022-0021

Published
2024-11-05
How to Cite
Rivero Moreno, L. D. (2024). Poor images and NFTs. On the preservation of digital heritage through blockchain technology. Ge-Conservacion, 26(1), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.37558/gec.v26i1.1224
Issue
Vol. 26 No. 1 (2024): Ge-conservación Nº26
Section
Artículos
  1. Copyright and intellectual property belongs to author. Author guarantees editing and publishing rights to Ge-Conservación Journal, under a Creative Commons Attribution License. This license allows others to share the work with authorship and the original source of publication acknowledgement.
  2. Articles can be used for scientific and educational purposes but never for commercial use, being sanctioned by law.
  3. The whole content of the article is author’s responsibility.
  4. Ge-Conservación Journal and authors may establish additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the work version published at the Journal (for example, on institutional repositories or on a book) with acknowledgment of the original publication on this Journal.
  5. Author is allowed and encouraged to disseminate his works electronically (for example, on institutional repositories or on its own website) after being published on Ge-Conservación Journal. This will contribute for fruitful interchanges as also for wider and earlier citations of the author’s works.
  6. Author’s personal data will only be used for the Journal purposes and will not be given to others.